Skip to main content

Why Does My Pedagogy Sound Like an Episode of Seinfeld?

It’s a pedagogy about nothing. But it encompasses everything. How else could it be? I mean, there is no way to really approach a consultation with a cohesive plan. Every person, every paper, every encounter brings with it a new opinion, a new view on working with people, or a new insight into how your own biases affect the way you consult. Sure, there are the ideals: don’t take over the paper, try to take culture and experience into account, give concrete examples…..but is there a theme? I have toyed with a directive minimalist approach, where you gage how much you direct the work (could be read ‘bully into your own opinion’) based on the writers experience, fluency, etc. But is that really a way to look at consulting? When everything is possible, is there anything left to rely on?


  1. I like this. I'm excited to read yours. Mine is about superheros.

  2. I don't know if this is quite what you're getting at, but I found it difficult to find a particular theory or article that I see as something I completely buy into and align with my own tutoring philosophy. I've found that when I sit down for a consultation and try to remember any of the advice from all of these articles, I find it stifling. I'm wrestling with these ideas in my head and I end up feeling more uncertain about how to go through the consultation, because so many of the articles we've looked at tell about so many of the "what not to dos," and many of the theories are stating opposing ideas. I have found that each consultation is a unique experience, and just rolling with it and trusting my own judgment gets me much further than trying to work through the consultation the way some renowned theorist or scholar says it is supposed to go. This is not to say that I haven't found valuable insights in the readings that have affected my own tutoring practice; I just think we have seen a staggering variety of opinions that can provide way too much to think about in a consultation.

  3. Elizabeth might have something to say about this...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Enough with the Prosti----- already

While I admit I was once intrigued by the prostitute-consultant analogy, not by what Scott Russell had to say about it but by some of the ideas we threw around in class the other day, I can honestly say, now, that I am beginning to move away from the metaphor. While I once connected prostitution and the writing center through their brief meetings and levels of intimacy, I now question the nature of those meetings and the levels of intimacy available, and like David said in class, I agree that the comparison is a stretch. Here’s where I struggle with a connection between meeting a stranger, a prostitute, for sex, and meeting a consultant at the writing center. Although the ‘client,’ ‘student,’ or whatever, meets with a stranger for a limited period time to meet a specific desire, the level of intimacy between sex with a prostitute and a writing consultation differs. It is my experience that consultations between peers can be genuinely intimate as one discusses personal thoughts—there i…

IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll!

I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)