Writing centers are responsible for fostering a sense of community, and we call ourselves consultants because of the type of interaction we have with students. After all, sometimes a consultation shows more symptoms of a therapeutic session than a paper revision. But as easy as it is to share a sense of community with our student population, it’s difficult to establish that same environment within the center itself. And there are several aspects to blame, such as center size, scheduling differences and high turnover rates. I don’t want to be misunderstood—I’m not saying that we should be like family, because that is an overused, inaccurate comparison. But as coworkers, we should at least be familiar with one another. Sadly, after working at the center for more than a year, I still (from time to time) exchange the “do I know you?” look with other consultants as if they were strangers. Yet in all seriousness, I have introduced myself to new-hires more than 6 weeks after having worked together.
The dynamic of each center affects how community is established and maintained, and size definitely has an influence on a center’s ability to create an open environment. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that one size— large or small—is easier to unite. Smaller centers oftentimes have one tutor or consultant working at a time by him- or herself, which eliminates opportunity for collaboration, but fewer people means—or should mean—that it’s easier for coworkers to get to know one another beyond scratching the surface. Of course my perspective is skewed towards larger writing centers, such as the one at Texas A&M. We have 41 consultants and several other staff members. One great thing about being a larger center is that our resources are more abundant. Some centers may not have the time, space, or money to come together as a unit on a regular basis. Fortunately, we are able to get everyone in the same place at least once a week, a privilege other centers don’t always have.
Structure and function, like size, contribute to maintaining community; scheduling differences have the potential to make or break a center’s ability to establish purposeful relationships between coworkers. At A&M, the scheduling system is fixed, so consultants work the same hours each week, which means working with the same colleagues each shift. With that in mind, it’s possible consultants may never see one another (if their shifts do not overlap). But like mentioned earlier, this concept isn’t isolated to large centers , because smaller ones are more likely to have individuals work by themselves. A more fluid system, where students pick up shifts or are assigned schedules may be harder to maintain. There are rational reasons for each system though, and the design of each center may dictate how the scheduling system is managed. Each has its benefits: while a fixed schedule has kept me from working with a variety of new people, it has also led me to create strong, long-lasting relationships. In fact, it’s this scheduling system that has allowed me to make close friendships that go beyond the center. Furthermore, our schedules change each semester, so after establishing a good relationship with some coworkers, a new opportunity is created for new relationships with others. From personal experience, work schedules are one of the best ways to create meaningful, purposeful relationships with colleagues, and directors can use the schedule as a tool to ensure new-hires have mentors they can use as guides in the learning process.
Lastly, potentially one of the primary challenges for both consultants and directors is high turnover rate. At A&M, undergraduates make up about 80% of our consultant population. Most students are hired after their freshman year and stay until graduation (about three years). However, in some cases, consultants are hired as juniors or seniors, which results in a lifespan lasting less than three years. This is definitely something directors have to take into consideration, because, just like with any business, turnover rates affect productivity, training finances, expertise, etc. With each new year, some consultants leave while new ones come in, which somewhat interrupts progress of bringing a center closer together. This repetitive cycle of creating and maintain community shows to be a never-ending struggle all writing centers face.
As I take these observations into consideration, I have to remind myself that my experience is limited while the variation of centers is unlimited. I understand that each center will have different systems and operating methods, consultant types (graduate vs. undergrad), and strategies, but regardless of structure, social interface is vital to any center. However, there are methods and programs that can be utilized in order to support a fluctuating system.
Popular posts from this blog
I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)
Dear me… As a junior in college, you were just trying your best and going through the motions (like everyone else) . You wanted to fit in and emulate what you thought a typical college student should look like. Then, along came the opportunity to become a w riting c onsultant. That’s immediately when the fear started, I began questioning myself and my own personal writing. I was unsure how I, a typical college student, would have enough skills to help others. How would I manage being insecure with myself when I was supposed to be someone my peers looked to find their own confidence? When it came to your first day of work, you were sitting in the writing lab waiting for your learner to show up with anxiety pouring out of your body. It was probably the most anxious you ever got in your life - aside from applying to college in the first place. You were so excited to meet your colleagues, yet so nervous that you were going to disappoint them. Thoughts streamed through your head
Testing Online Tutoring Online tutoring may be a constant of the tutoring landscape, but the question of effectiveness remains. Which organizations are best prepared to meet the needs of students: writing centers affiliated with universities or “professional” tutoring agencies, such as Pearson-Smarthinking? It is this question I intend to address in conducting a proposed experiment. Important Background Information The concept most central to this proposed experiment is that of knowledge claims. In his book Reformers, Teachers, Writers: Curricular and Pedagogical Inquiries , Neal Lerner identifies the three primary types of knowledge claims that appear in a writing center: “writerly knowledge,” “emotional knowledge,” and “role knowledge” (Lerner 115). “Role knowledge” is arguably the most important knowledge claim (Lerner 115). While analyzing transcripts of student sessions, Lerner noticed there was a correlation between the presence of “role knowledge” claims and the “success”