“I’M SIGNIFICANT! … screamed the dust speck.”
A Look at the Marginalization and Feminization of Writing Centers
Calvin and Hobbes is my favorite comic strip. In one memorable episode, the main character, Calvin, stands beneath a starry sky and says, “I’M SIGNIFICANT! … screamed the dust speck.” He saw that his one person out of everything in the universe was about as miraculous and special as he would consider a speck of dust.
How often do workers in writing centers end up feeling like dust specks? In my experience, which, granted, is small, I have not met a fellow student who understood and appreciated the work that is done in the writing center. Most students walk by our center with a skeptical look in their eye, as if they are not sure why we are here. Friends ask questions like, “Does anyone even visit the Writing Lab?” or “What do you do at work?” After my detailed explanation and defense of the Lab’s mission, they respond with a half-hearted, “Oh, that’s nice.” While the students who regularly come to our lab are grateful for the help they receive, the rest of our university is somewhat indifferent to our existence.
In her search for a position as a writing center director, Melissa Nicolas observed the lack of respect and the excess of incredulity she received from her interviewers. Her article “Where the Women are: Writing Centers and the Academic Hierarchy” talks about how writing centers are not high on “the ladder of institutional respect.” None of her potential employers believed her first job choice was the director of the writing center. This is evidence of the insignificant role writing centers play in the minds of the administration: The writing center is so unimportant to them that they do not understand why someone would want to be in charge of it. (I would like to mention that I do not think this is the case at every university. Some writing centers are integral to their school’s academics. In addition, the students can also be the ones who consider the center unimportant.)
Nicolas goes on to say that she believes this opinion of writing centers is caused, in part, by the “feminization of the writing center narrative.” She asserts that the “nurturing, service-oriented” nature of the center causes people to think of it as “women’s work,” which bears the connotation of busy-work tasks. Imagine other tasks that might be called “women’s work:” laundry, cleaning, keeping house. While these tasks are essential, no one really wants to do them. That is the kind of attitude that Nicolas says is being attached to the idea of the writing center. The large number of women employed in writing centers does not help this image: Nicolas observes that “women make up a majority of the writing center community.” At my university, seven out of seven consultants, including the director, are women.
So, what do we do? How do we break free from our current dust speck status? Administrations and students do not see the writing center as important. Perhaps the answer lies in the cause of our marginalization. Though I do not agree with Nicolas’ overtly feminist view, finding the cause for our invisibility may be the best way to overcome it. If it is not the feminization of the center that brings on disrespect, what does? In regards to the large presence of women, how do we encourage men to become a part of writing centers? These are questions I personally cannot answer, but I believe the answers will help lead us to a more visible, and more respected, writing center. One day I would like to see more students coming into the writing center than walking past it. I would like to see writing centers become at least a planet instead of remaining a dust speck.
Nicolas, Melissa. “Where the Women are: Writing Centers and the Academic Hierarchy.” FPO:
IP Research and Communities (2004) : n. page. Web. 5 Mar. 2013.
Popular posts from this blog
I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)
Dear me… As a junior in college, you were just trying your best and going through the motions (like everyone else) . You wanted to fit in and emulate what you thought a typical college student should look like. Then, along came the opportunity to become a w riting c onsultant. That’s immediately when the fear started, I began questioning myself and my own personal writing. I was unsure how I, a typical college student, would have enough skills to help others. How would I manage being insecure with myself when I was supposed to be someone my peers looked to find their own confidence? When it came to your first day of work, you were sitting in the writing lab waiting for your learner to show up with anxiety pouring out of your body. It was probably the most anxious you ever got in your life - aside from applying to college in the first place. You were so excited to meet your colleagues, yet so nervous that you were going to disappoint them. Thoughts streamed through your head
Testing Online Tutoring Online tutoring may be a constant of the tutoring landscape, but the question of effectiveness remains. Which organizations are best prepared to meet the needs of students: writing centers affiliated with universities or “professional” tutoring agencies, such as Pearson-Smarthinking? It is this question I intend to address in conducting a proposed experiment. Important Background Information The concept most central to this proposed experiment is that of knowledge claims. In his book Reformers, Teachers, Writers: Curricular and Pedagogical Inquiries , Neal Lerner identifies the three primary types of knowledge claims that appear in a writing center: “writerly knowledge,” “emotional knowledge,” and “role knowledge” (Lerner 115). “Role knowledge” is arguably the most important knowledge claim (Lerner 115). While analyzing transcripts of student sessions, Lerner noticed there was a correlation between the presence of “role knowledge” claims and the “success”