One of the biggest problems I have faced during my semester of being a Writing Fellow has been getting students to schedule appointments. I work with a Basic Writing class, so the majority of the students I work with are freshmen. I believe not being in college for a long while has something to do with the students’ lack of scheduling. Because they are new to the school, freshmen often don’t understand how valuable the skills learned in our sessions can be. I didn’t understand how important the peer review process was was until I took an advanced level course on Literary Criticism and Analysis. It was also in this advanced level course that I had my first experience with a Writing Fellow. I was also reluctant at first. My schedule hardly had any openings as it was; I was also required to meet with someone for additional help. However, when I actually sat down with her, I gained a great sense of confidence. I might not have done well on some of my papers, but at least I knew someone saw that I understood the material. I feel that a couple of students that see me understand how our meetings are beneficial, but for those who don’t, I am concerned. They are required after all to see me at least three times during the semester. It’s imperative to their grade, yet they do not schedule.
The director of the Writing Fellows program provided a solution to my problem. We sat down and spoke about what was going on. He showed me a strategy to sending out emails that would express how important it was to have each individual come in for an appointment. It was simple. The subject line of the email contained the last name of the student. In this way, it was expressed that the student was on my agenda. My director described it as a way to get the attention of the student. Then I typed a message giving the details of the next assignment and a reminder of how to schedule an appointment, copied the message, and pasted it on to each student’s email. It made a huge difference. The next day, I had three students sign up. This was an incredible improvement from the many weeks I had looking at a blank schedule. Maybe this is the solution.
Popular posts from this blog
I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)
Dear me… As a junior in college, you were just trying your best and going through the motions (like everyone else) . You wanted to fit in and emulate what you thought a typical college student should look like. Then, along came the opportunity to become a w riting c onsultant. That’s immediately when the fear started, I began questioning myself and my own personal writing. I was unsure how I, a typical college student, would have enough skills to help others. How would I manage being insecure with myself when I was supposed to be someone my peers looked to find their own confidence? When it came to your first day of work, you were sitting in the writing lab waiting for your learner to show up with anxiety pouring out of your body. It was probably the most anxious you ever got in your life - aside from applying to college in the first place. You were so excited to meet your colleagues, yet so nervous that you were going to disappoint them. Thoughts streamed through your head
Testing Online Tutoring Online tutoring may be a constant of the tutoring landscape, but the question of effectiveness remains. Which organizations are best prepared to meet the needs of students: writing centers affiliated with universities or “professional” tutoring agencies, such as Pearson-Smarthinking? It is this question I intend to address in conducting a proposed experiment. Important Background Information The concept most central to this proposed experiment is that of knowledge claims. In his book Reformers, Teachers, Writers: Curricular and Pedagogical Inquiries , Neal Lerner identifies the three primary types of knowledge claims that appear in a writing center: “writerly knowledge,” “emotional knowledge,” and “role knowledge” (Lerner 115). “Role knowledge” is arguably the most important knowledge claim (Lerner 115). While analyzing transcripts of student sessions, Lerner noticed there was a correlation between the presence of “role knowledge” claims and the “success”