Skip to main content

Giving the actual dimensions of the ESL ASL bridge

I just finished reading LeAnn Nash's article, "ESL in a Different Light: Can You Hear Me Now?," in WLN 32.9. I enjoyed the article and think if offers some useful points and insights, but I feel that she did not go quite far enough on one point: ASL may directly translate to Standard American English, but the words do not always mean the same things.

By this I mean that an ASL sentence can be translated directly to a SAE sentence, but that the exact words do not have the same meanings. For example, I worked with a Deaf student a few months ago. We did not have an interpretor for the first meeting, so we worked on the computer, each typing questions and answers. I thought the session went well. However, for the next appointment we did have an interpretor and when I started to work with through the interpretor, the paper took a different direction. The interpretor understood that some words mean different things in ASL, but the words are written and use exactly like SAE words. For example, the writer used the word 'building.' I envisioned one of the buildings on campus and worked with him to revise his paragraph following that idea. But when the interpretor translated for me, the writer did not mean 'building' in the way I was thinking, but rather the organization that was housed within the building. After that was translated, the entire paper made far more sense and I was able to help the writer better.

I agree that we need to understand that working with Deaf writers is difficult and different, but I think it is also important that we understand that the words may be the same, they do not mean the same things.

Comments

  1. Zach-I wonder how many words do not mean the same things in ASL. Could the 'building' example be one of only a few? If so, that may be a minor roadblock, as certain words have different meanings in different regions of the country. If a large percentage of ASL doesn't translate to spoken or written English then I think you're definitely right, and it should get some academic attention.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I haven't seen Nash's article yet, but it sounds interesting.

    Some of the grammatical structures in ASL don't translate either, for instance the lack of pronouns in ASL. There is a great article by Margaret Weaver, called "Transcending Conversing," which I would definitely recommend. It does a great job at looking at ASL/ESL concerns from a tutor's perspective.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Enough with the Prosti----- already

While I admit I was once intrigued by the prostitute-consultant analogy, not by what Scott Russell had to say about it but by some of the ideas we threw around in class the other day, I can honestly say, now, that I am beginning to move away from the metaphor. While I once connected prostitution and the writing center through their brief meetings and levels of intimacy, I now question the nature of those meetings and the levels of intimacy available, and like David said in class, I agree that the comparison is a stretch. Here’s where I struggle with a connection between meeting a stranger, a prostitute, for sex, and meeting a consultant at the writing center. Although the ‘client,’ ‘student,’ or whatever, meets with a stranger for a limited period time to meet a specific desire, the level of intimacy between sex with a prostitute and a writing consultation differs. It is my experience that consultations between peers can be genuinely intimate as one discusses personal thoughts—there i…

IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll!

I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)