Hi, everyone! I had a weird consulting experience yesterday that left me with questions pertaining to the invasiveness of the work we do. I had a consultation with a writer yesterday who was working on revising an essay. He was very quiet and seemed somewhat lost, without any goals of what he hoped to accomplish. (Signs that perhaps he had been forced into the center, I suppose). We read through parts of his essay, and decided to work on issues of sentence structure. I slid a pencil and notepad his way, so we could try out some choices for his sentences specifically. He hid the notepad from my view and started writing furiously. After about two minutes he looked back up, but he still seemed to be actively hiding the notepad.
Was he embarrassed about the notes he had taken? Had he been writing something that didn't pertain to our conversation at all? Would either of these things have been any of my business? I didn't ask him what he wrote and he didn't tell me: we continued our conversation on the sentence. This secret writing break occurred three more times during our consultation. Each time I debated whether or not to ask him what he was writing. I'm hyper-aware of being too teacher-authoritative in the center, so I didn't want to say something that would sound like "ahem, Can you share it with class, please?" I wanted our session to be productive, but I also didn't want to invade his privacy. He has the right to write, after all. But was his writing in the interest of the session? Is it my job to find out and mediate? Would you have confronted the issue? How and when?
Popular posts from this blog
I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)
So, I was driving to school today and as always was listening to NPR (that's my self-promoting conversational piece informing you on how intelligent and connected I am) really, I just like the coverage on the campaign and "This American Life." Okay, I am already getting off topic and I haven't even gotten on topic yet. Anyhow, the story I was listening to was about a woman who used to be a part of the admissions committee at Dartmouth and is now working as an independent consultant helping students with the admissions process for schools. For a cool $40,000, she will work with you from 9th grade to graduation to help prepare you for your college admissions process. And for the budget price of $14,000, she will help you write and revise your college application essay. So, how in the world does this correlate to our world? Well, her work with college applications includes helping students decide on effective topics (staying away from "teen angst, or
I remember my first year as a peer tutor at my high school’s writing center. I could not have been more than fifteen years old when I went to my very first orientation session. I had absolutely no idea what I was doing, but I was enthusiastic to learn. That year, the managers of my center were very excited to tell us all about something called minimalist theory. Minimalist theory is a consulting style that focuses on getting students to think for themselves. I won’t go too much in depth here, but if you want to know more I wrote a different article on the subject called “Minimalist Theory: When and When not to Use it.” The managers pushed this theory pretty hard, undoubtably because they wanted us to focus on practicing it. However, in doing so I, as an itty-bitty baby consultant, internalized the message that minimalist theory was the only way to teach writing. This was a problem for a number of reasons but the main one is that minimalism is most certainly NOT th