Hi, everyone! I had a weird consulting experience yesterday that left me with questions pertaining to the invasiveness of the work we do. I had a consultation with a writer yesterday who was working on revising an essay. He was very quiet and seemed somewhat lost, without any goals of what he hoped to accomplish. (Signs that perhaps he had been forced into the center, I suppose). We read through parts of his essay, and decided to work on issues of sentence structure. I slid a pencil and notepad his way, so we could try out some choices for his sentences specifically. He hid the notepad from my view and started writing furiously. After about two minutes he looked back up, but he still seemed to be actively hiding the notepad.
Was he embarrassed about the notes he had taken? Had he been writing something that didn't pertain to our conversation at all? Would either of these things have been any of my business? I didn't ask him what he wrote and he didn't tell me: we continued our conversation on the sentence. This secret writing break occurred three more times during our consultation. Each time I debated whether or not to ask him what he was writing. I'm hyper-aware of being too teacher-authoritative in the center, so I didn't want to say something that would sound like "ahem, Can you share it with class, please?" I wanted our session to be productive, but I also didn't want to invade his privacy. He has the right to write, after all. But was his writing in the interest of the session? Is it my job to find out and mediate? Would you have confronted the issue? How and when?
Popular posts from this blog
I have posted a poll in the IWCA forums: IWCA Forum: Peer Tutor => What do we call ourselves: the poll! It is a part of an earlier discussion that kind of petered out about the titles used for writing center workers. Please take a moment and vote! If you don't have an account on the forum, you can register for one by clicking on the "Register" link (next to the rocket icon in the top-right of the page.) Don't forget to state your institutional affiliation when you request and account. (That's how the IWCA Forum keeps out spam accounts.)
Dear me… As a junior in college, you were just trying your best and going through the motions (like everyone else) . You wanted to fit in and emulate what you thought a typical college student should look like. Then, along came the opportunity to become a w riting c onsultant. That’s immediately when the fear started, I began questioning myself and my own personal writing. I was unsure how I, a typical college student, would have enough skills to help others. How would I manage being insecure with myself when I was supposed to be someone my peers looked to find their own confidence? When it came to your first day of work, you were sitting in the writing lab waiting for your learner to show up with anxiety pouring out of your body. It was probably the most anxious you ever got in your life - aside from applying to college in the first place. You were so excited to meet your colleagues, yet so nervous that you were going to disappoint them. Thoughts streamed through your head
Testing Online Tutoring Online tutoring may be a constant of the tutoring landscape, but the question of effectiveness remains. Which organizations are best prepared to meet the needs of students: writing centers affiliated with universities or “professional” tutoring agencies, such as Pearson-Smarthinking? It is this question I intend to address in conducting a proposed experiment. Important Background Information The concept most central to this proposed experiment is that of knowledge claims. In his book Reformers, Teachers, Writers: Curricular and Pedagogical Inquiries , Neal Lerner identifies the three primary types of knowledge claims that appear in a writing center: “writerly knowledge,” “emotional knowledge,” and “role knowledge” (Lerner 115). “Role knowledge” is arguably the most important knowledge claim (Lerner 115). While analyzing transcripts of student sessions, Lerner noticed there was a correlation between the presence of “role knowledge” claims and the “success”